Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301714›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2022

The COVID Positive Pathway: a collaboration between public health agencies, primary care, and metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne.

Seok Ming Lim, Nicole L Allard, Janelle Devereux, Benjamin C Cowie, Michelle Tydeman, Alistair Miller, Khanh Ho, Brigitte Cleveland, Liz Singleton, Karen Aarons and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the advancements of Australian OPAT.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Seok Ming LimThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-0884
Nicole L AllardCohealth, Melbourne, VIC.
Janelle DevereuxNorth Western Melbourne Primary Health Network, Melbourne, VIC.
Benjamin C CowieWHO Collaborating Centre for Viral Hepatitis, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-7087-5895
Michelle TydemanCohealth, Melbourne, VIC.
Alistair MillerDjerriwarrh Health Services, Bacchus Marsh, VIC.
Khanh HoDjerriwarrh Health Services, Bacchus Marsh, VIC.
Brigitte ClevelandDjerriwarrh Health Services, Bacchus Marsh, VIC.
Liz SingletonDjerriwarrh Health Services, Bacchus Marsh, VIC.
Karen AaronsWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Paul EleftheriouWerribee Mercy Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
Thomas ChanVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
George BraitbergThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-4013-3364
Andrea MaierThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
BAE Systems (Sweden) · SEThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUHealth Net · USMercy Hospital · USThe University of Melbourne · AUVictorian Health Promotion Foundation · AUVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLWestern Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the capacity of the COVID Positive Pathway, a collaborative model of care involving the Victorian public health unit, hospital services, primary care, community organisations, and the North Western Melbourne Primary Health Network, to support people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) isolating at home. DESIGN, SETTING,

participantsCohort study of adults in northwest Melbourne with COVID-19, 3 August - 31 December 2020.

main outcome measuresDemographic and clinical characteristics, and social and welfare needs of people cared for in the Pathway, by care tier level.

resultsOf 1392 people referred to the Pathway by the public health unit, 858 were eligible for enrolment, and 711 consented to participation; 647 (91%) remained in the Pathway until they had recovered and isolation was no longer required. A total of 575 participants (81%) received care in primary care, mostly from their usual general practitioners; 155 people (22%) received care from hospital outreach services, and 64 (9%) needed high tier care (hospitalisation). Assistance with food and other basic supplies was required by 239 people in the Pathway (34%).

conclusionsThe COVID Positive Pathway is a feasible multidisciplinary, tiered model of care for people with COVID-19. About 80% of participants could be adequately supported by primary care and community organisations, allowing hospital services to be reserved for people with more severe illness or with risk factors for disease progression. The principles of this model could be applied to other health conditions if regulatory and funding barriers to information-sharing and care delivery by health care providers can be overcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCohort StudiesHospitals, UrbanHumansPrimary Health CarePublic HealthEnvironment and public healthGeneral medicineHealth services administrationInfectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID35301714
PMCPMC9115045
OpenAlexW4220918554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.