Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301674›Full record

SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2022

Pain's Adverse Impact on Training-Induced Performance and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review.

Nikola Stanisic, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson, Mohit Kothari, Yuri Martins Costa, Limor Avivi-Arber, Peter Svensson

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Nikola StanisicDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden. nikola.stanisic@mau.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1600-5490
Birgitta Häggman-HenriksonDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-3739
Mohit KothariDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Hammel Neurorehabilitation Center and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-9769
Yuri Martins CostaDepartment of Biosciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-5020
Limor Avivi-ArberProsthodontics and Oral Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-6101
Peter SvenssonDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-8089
Malmö University · SEAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor training is a widely used therapy in many pain conditions. The brain's capacity to undergo functional and structural changes i.e., neuroplasticity is fundamental to training-induced motor improvement and can be assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The aim was to investigate the impact of pain on training-induced motor performance and neuroplasticity assessed by TMS. The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA-guidelines and a Prospero protocol (CRD42020168487). An electronic search in PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane until December 13, 2019, identified studies focused on training-induced neuroplasticity in the presence of experimentally-induced pain, 'acute pain' or in a chronic pain condition, 'chronic pain'. Included studies were assessed by two authors for methodological quality using the TMS Quality checklist, and for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The literature search identified 231 studies. After removal of 71 duplicates, 160 abstracts were screened, and 24 articles were reviewed in full text. Of these, 17 studies on acute pain (n = 7) or chronic pain (n = 10), including a total of 258 patients with different pain conditions and 248 healthy participants met the inclusion criteria. The most common types of motor training were different finger tasks (n = 6). Motor training was associated with motor cortex functional neuroplasticity and six of seven acute pain studies and five of ten chronic pain studies showed that, compared to controls, pain can impede such trainings-induced neuroplasticity. These findings may have implications for motor learning and performance and with putative impact on rehabilitative procedures such as physiotherapy.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMotor CortexChronic DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationExerciseMotor functionNeuronal plasticityNociceptionTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35301674
PMCPMC9581826
OpenAlexW4220665698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.