Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301662›Full record

Trial reportGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022

Computed tomography radiomics-based distinction of invasive adenocarcinoma from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules with bubble-like signs.

Yining Jiang, Ziqi Xiong, Wenjing Zhao, Jingyu Zhang, Yan Guo, Guosheng Li, Zhiyong Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yining JiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Ziqi XiongDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Wenjing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jingyu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yan GuoGE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Guosheng LiDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zhiyong LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. zjy_lzy@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-1460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore an effective model based on radiomics features extracted from nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) images to distinguish invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) presenting as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) with bubble-like (B-pGGNs) signs. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 511 nodules (MIA, n = 288; IAC, n = 223) between November 2012 and June 2018 from almost all pGGNs pathologically confirmed MIA or IAC. Eventually, a total of 109 B-pGGNs (MIA, n = 55; IAC, n = 54) from 109 patients fulfilling the criteria were randomly assigned to the training and test cluster at a ratio of 7:3. The gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) method and logistic regression (LR) analysis were applied to feature selection (radiomics, semantic, and conventional CT features). LR was performed to construct three models (the conventional, radiomics and combined model). The performance of the predictive models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsThe radiomics model had good AUCs of 0.947 in the training cluster and of 0.945 in the test cluster. The combined model produced an AUC of 0.953 in the training cluster and of 0.945 in the test cluster. The combined model yielded no performance improvement (vs. the radiomics model). The rad_score was the only independent predictor of invasiveness.

conclusionThe radiomics model showed excellent predictive performance in discriminating IAC from MIA presenting as B-pGGNs and may provide a necessary reference for extending clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaLung NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBubble-like signInvasive adenocarcinoma (IAC)Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA)Pure ground-glass nodule (pGGN)Radiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.