ArticleCommunity mental health journal2022
Increasing Access to CBT for Psychosis: Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Specialized Outpatient Service.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the increasing demand for cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), the existing literature is lacking in terms of models for sustainable implementation. The aims of this study were to: (a) describe the development of a specialized CBTp Service; (b) report demographic characteristics and referral patterns over 1 year to examine feasibility; and (c) review feedback from participants in group-based CBTp to examine acceptability. Data were analyzed from 126 referrals (M = 35.52, SD = 13.06, 59.5% men) to an outpatient CBTp Service at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Toronto, Ontario) between January 2019 to January 2020. Anonymous feedback was obtained from 54 individuals who completed group-based CBTp. Positive symptoms and distressing emotions were the main reasons for referral. Over half of eligible referrals scheduled an intake assessment and 70% of individuals who completed this assessment attended further treatment. Primary reasons for service refusal were scheduling conflicts and illness-related barriers. The total service wait-time was two months, with the longest delay between dates of referral and initial contact. Satisfaction with the quality of CBTp and its components was rated high among group members. Although variable wait-times and engagement levels were identified across stages of the referral process, the CBTp Service demonstrates preliminary feasibility and acceptability, and provides a model of service delivery to incorporate within future CBTp implementation efforts in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35301615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.