Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301570›Full record

ArticleArchives of virology2022

Avian leukosis virus (ALV) is highly prevalent in fancy-chicken flocks in Saxony.

Markus Freick, Ruben Schreiter, Jim Weber, Thomas W Vahlenkamp, Kristin Heenemann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Avian Leukosis: Will We Be Able to Get Rid of It?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Markus FreickFaculty Agriculture/Environment/Chemistry, HTW Dresden-University of Applied Sciences, Pillnitzer Platz 2, 01326, Dresden, Germany. markus.freick@htw-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2695-8316
Ruben SchreiterZAFT e.V.-Centre for Applied Research and Technology, Friedrich-List-Platz 1, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Jim WeberVeterinary Practice Zettlitz, Straße der Jugend 68, 09306, Zettlitz OT Methau, Germany.
Thomas W VahlenkampVeterinary Faculty, Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Virology, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 29, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Kristin HeenemannVeterinary Faculty, Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Virology, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 29, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEHochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences · DENeurologisches Fachkrankenhaus für Bewegungsstörungen/Parkinson · DE

Funding

Saxonian Fancy Poultry Breeder´s Association 1/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current prevalence of avian leukosis virus (ALV) in fancy chickens in Germany is unknown. Therefore, 537 cloacal swabs from 50 purebred fancy-chicken flocks in Saxony were tested for the presence of the ALV p27 protein using a commercial antigen-capture ELISA. The detection rate was 28.7% at the individual-animal level and 56.0% at the flock level. Phylogenetic analysis of PCR products obtained from 22 different flocks revealed the highest similarity to ALV subtype K. When classifying breeds by their origin, ALV detection rates differed significantly. Evaluation of questionnaire data revealed no significant differences between ALV-positive and negative flocks regarding mortality.

Indexed as

Avian LeukosisAvian Leukosis VirusAnimalsChickensGermanyPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35301570
PMCPMC8964621
OpenAlexW4221077767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.