ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2022
[Minimally invasive stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis with transsacral bar and retrograde transpubic screw].
Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring lesions in the elderly: current evidence and recent advances.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Review
- Special screw corridors and imaging in pelvic ring trauma.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Review
- Simultaneous minimally invasive surgery improves outcomes and reduces complications in elderly with combined osteoporotic fractures.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Chronic pelvic insufficiency fractures and their treatment.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Review
- Compressive effect and collapse behavior of three different transsacral implants in sacral fragility fractures - a retrospective analysis of 106 cases.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of an experimental internal ring fixator (RingFix) for stabilization of pelvic ring injuries on an osteoporotic bone model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Minimally invasive bilateral fixed angle locking fixation of the dorsal pelvic ring: clinical proof of concept and preliminary treatment results.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Channel Screw and Conventional Plate Technique in Tile B2 Pelvic Fracture.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Succession of failures in surgical management of fragility fracture of the pelvis.Trauma case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveStabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) using a minimally invasive technique. Insertion of a transsacral rod into the transsacral corridor of S1. Insertion of a retrograde transpubic screw through the superior branch of the pubic bone. INDICATIONS: Uni- or bilateral displaced fragility fractures of the sacrum or sacroiliac joint. Nondisplaced fractures of the sacrum or sacroiliac joint in case of nonsuccessful conservative treatment. Uni- or bilateral fractures of the superior branch of the pubic bone, which are present in combination with a posterior pelvic instability. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Fragility fractures of the pelvis, which can be successfully treated conservatively. Absence of transsacral corridor in sacral body S1. Major displacement, nonreducible fractures of the superior branch of the pubic bone. Soft tissue infection at insertion site of implants. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The transsacral bar is inserted under fluoroscopic control from ilium to ilium through the transsacral corridor of the sacral body S1. The retrograde transpubic screw is inserted from the pubic tubercle through the superior branch of the pubic bone past the acetabulum into the body of the ilium. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: An early mobilization with weight bearing of both lower extremities as tolerated by the patient is allowed. Conventional radiographs for control of the position of the implants and fractures are taken after mobilization
resultsIn all, 64 patients with FFP type II, FFP type III or FFP type IV were stabilized with a transacral bar osteosynthesis in the posterior pelvis. In 32 patients (50%), additional sacroiliac screws were inserted. In 29 patients (45.3%) the transsacral bar osteosynthesis was combined with a transpubic retrograde screw. Median length of hospital stay was 17.5 days. In all, 20 patients (31.3%) suffered general, 10 patients (15.6%) suffered surgery-related complications, and 41 patients (64.1%) were mobile in the room or on the ward at discharge. One-year mortality was 10.9%. The values of the SF‑8 Physical and Mental Component Scores, Parker Mobility Score and Numeric Rating Scale were moderate, yet comparable with the values of patients of the same age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.