ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[Long-term survival in cancer: definitions, concepts, and design principles of survivorship programs].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- General practitioners' involvement in oncological aftercare (ACTION): a study protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- From information to action: how medical reports can support general practitioners in long-term cancer care-a qualitative exploratory study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Expert-guided approaches to complementary interventions for common side effects of cancer therapies: a practice-based perspective from integrative oncology centers in Baden-Württemberg, Germany.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Changes in health-related quality of life, depression, and fear of progression during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond: a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Psychosocial distress in young adults surviving hematological malignancies: a pilot study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Effects of a Mind-Body Medicine Group Program for Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to improvements in diagnostics and treatment options in hematology and oncology, and thus increasing chances of survival, the number of long-term survivors living with and after a cancer disease in Germany is constantly rising. Although the existing German healthcare system provides multifaceted healthcare offers that are available to long-term survivors, the healthcare situation of this population is not satisfactory. Thus, orientation guides for long-term survivors as well as new and innovative survivorship programs should be developed. This paper provides an overview of the complex of problems, defines relevant concepts, and devises central topics for the development of survivorship programs for long-term cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.