Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301449›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2022

Detection of ovarian cancer via the spectral fingerprinting of quantum-defect-modified carbon nanotubes in serum by machine learning.

Mijin Kim, Chen Chen, Peng Wang, Joseph J Mulvey, Yoona Yang, Christopher Wun, Merav Antman-Passig, Hong-Bin Luo, Sun Cho, Kara Long-Roche and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomaterials for biomarker imaging and detection.Journal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Urine-Based Machine Learning Assay Detects Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Writing DNA Bases into spResearch square · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. High-throughput SWCNT NIR-II screening enables cell andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mijin KimMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-9466
Chen ChenMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-0183
Peng WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Joseph J MulveyMontefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0692-4549
Yoona YangDepartments of Bioengineering, and Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Christopher WunHunter College High School, New York, NY, USA.
Merav Antman-PassigMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hong-Bin LuoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Sun ChoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kara Long-RocheMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lakshmi V RamanathanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anand JagotaDepartments of Bioengineering, and Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-0880
Ming ZhengMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-1348
YuHuang WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-1849
Daniel A HellerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. hellerd@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-0000

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Training and Career Development CoreU54CA132378 · NCI · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI Tim Alan Ahles, ADRIANA ESPINOSA · 2008 to 2026
$28.9M
Training and Career Development and Education CoreU54CA137788 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ADRIANA ESPINOSA, FRANCESCA M GANY · 2008 to 2026
$28.1M
P-selectin-Mediated Targeting of PI3K Nanomedicines to the Tumor MicroenvironmentR01CA215719 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HELLER, DANIEL ALAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Chemical Gating of a Tube-in-a-Tube SemiconductorR01GM114167 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI WANG, YUHUANG · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215719NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA137788NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum biomarkers are often insufficiently sensitive or specific to facilitate cancer screening or diagnostic testing. In ovarian cancer, the few established serum biomarkers are highly specific, yet insufficiently sensitive to detect early-stage disease and to impact the mortality rates of patients with this cancer. Here we show that a 'disease fingerprint' acquired via machine learning from the spectra of near-infrared fluorescence emissions of an array of carbon nanotubes functionalized with quantum defects detects high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in serum samples from symptomatic individuals with 87% sensitivity at 98% specificity (compared with 84% sensitivity at 98% specificity for the current best clinical screening test, which uses measurements of cancer antigen 125 and transvaginal ultrasonography). We used 269 serum samples to train and validate several machine-learning classifiers for the discrimination of patients with ovarian cancer from those with other diseases and from healthy individuals. The predictive values of the best classifier could not be attained via known protein biomarkers, suggesting that the array of nanotube sensors responds to unidentified serum biomarkers.

Indexed as

Nanotubes, CarbonOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMachine LearningBiomarkers, TumorNanotubes, Carbon

Identifiers

PMID35301449
PMCPMC9108893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.