Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301400›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Fully automated platelet differential interference contrast image analysis via deep learning.

Carly Kempster, George Butler, Elina Kuznecova, Kirk A Taylor, Neline Kriek, Gemma Little, Marcin A Sowa, Tanya Sage, Louise J Johnson, Jonathan M Gibbins and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carly Kempster *School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
George Butler *School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Elina KuznecovaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Kirk A TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Neline KriekSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Gemma LittleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Marcin A SowaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Tanya SageSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Louise J JohnsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Jonathan M GibbinsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Alice Y PollittSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. a.pollitt@reading.ac.uk.
University of Reading · GBJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/17/31/32848British Heart Foundation NC/S001441/1British Heart Foundation PG/17/76/33082British Heart Foundation RG/20/7/34866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelets mediate arterial thrombosis, a leading cause of myocardial infarction and stroke. During injury, platelets adhere and spread over exposed subendothelial matrix substrates of the damaged blood vessel wall. The mechanisms which govern platelet activation and their interaction with a range of substrates are therefore regularly investigated using platelet spreading assays. These assays often use differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy to assess platelet morphology and analysis performed using manual annotation. Here, a convolutional neural network (CNN) allowed fully automated analysis of platelet spreading assays captured by DIC microscopy. The CNN was trained using 120 generalised training images. Increasing the number of training images increases the mean average precision of the CNN. The CNN performance was compared to six manual annotators. Significant variation was observed between annotators, highlighting bias when manual analysis is performed. The CNN effectively analysed platelet morphology when platelets spread over a range of substrates (CRP-XL, vWF and fibrinogen), in the presence and absence of inhibitors (dasatinib, ibrutinib and PRT-060318) and agonist (thrombin), with results consistent in quantifying spread platelet area which is comparable to published literature. The application of a CNN enables, for the first time, automated analysis of platelet spreading assays captured by DIC microscopy.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlatelet Activation

Identifiers

PMID35301400
PMCPMC8931011
OpenAlexW4220772510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.