Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301322›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2022

The primate gut mycobiome-bacteriome interface is impacted by environmental and subsistence factors.

Ashok K Sharma, Sam Davison, Barbora Pafco, Jonathan B Clayton, Jessica M Rothman, Matthew R McLennan, Marie Cibot, Terence Fuh, Roman Vodicka, Carolyn Jost Robinson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gut microbial community in proboscis monkeys (Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ashok K SharmaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-7628
Sam DavisonDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Barbora PafcoInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jonathan B ClaytonDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-3362
Jessica M RothmanDepartment of Anthropology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew R McLennanDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Marie CibotDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Terence FuhWWF Central African Republic, Bayanga, Central African Republic.
Roman VodickaPrague Zoo, Prague, Czech Republic.
Carolyn Jost RobinsonDepartment of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Klara PetrzelkovaInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Andres GomezDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. gomeza@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1174-0368
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology · CZOxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCity University of New York · USPrague Zoo · CZPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome of primates is known to be influenced by both host genetic background and subsistence strategy. However, these inferences have been made mainly based on adaptations in bacterial composition - the bacteriome and have commonly overlooked the fungal fraction - the mycobiome. To further understand the factors that shape the gut mycobiome of primates and mycobiome-bacteriome interactions, we sequenced 16 S rRNA and ITS2 markers in fecal samples of four different nonhuman primate species and three human groups under different subsistence patterns (n = 149). The results show that gut mycobiome composition in primates is still largely unknown but highly plastic and weakly structured by primate phylogeny, compared with the bacteriome. We find significant gut mycobiome overlap between captive apes and human populations living under industrialized subsistence contexts; this is in contrast with contemporary hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists, who share more mycobiome traits with diverse wild-ranging nonhuman primates. In addition, mycobiome-bacteriome interactions were specific to each population, revealing that individual, lifestyle and intrinsic ecological factors affect structural correspondence, number, and kind of interactions between gut bacteria and fungi in primates. Our findings indicate a dominant effect of ecological niche, environmental factors, and diet over the phylogenetic background of the host, in shaping gut mycobiome composition and mycobiome-bacteriome interactions in primates.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMycobiomeAnimalsBacteriaPhylogenyPrimates

Identifiers

PMID35301322
PMCPMC8930997
OpenAlexW4220683282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.