ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022
Unveiling the Differences in Biological Properties of Dental Pulp Stem Cells from Normal and Inflamed Pulp: A Comprehensive Comparative Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological properties of Ceraputty as a retrograde filling material: an in vitro study on hPDLSCs.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Clinical trials using dental stem cells: 2022 update.World journal of stem cells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of the study were to comprehensively compare the morphology, immunophenotype, proliferation, migration, and regeneration potential of normal dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) versus inflammatory dental pulp stem cells (iDPSCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS Healthy pulp or inflamed pulp tissue was used to isolate and culture DPSCs and iDPSCs, respectively. These cell populations were characterized by flow cytometry, colony formation assay, transwell assay, and multi-directional differentiation in vitro. RESULTS No difference was observed in the morphology, cell-surface markers, or cell migration between DPSCs and iDPSCs. DPSCs showed a higher colony-forming capacity, proliferative viability, and osteo/dentinogenesis ability compared with iDPSCs. However, iDPSCs demonstrated enhanced neurogenesis, angiogenesis, adipogenesis, and chondrogenesis capacities in comparison to DPSCs. CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed the differences of biological properties between DPSCs and iDPSCs. The highly angiogenic and neurogenic potential of iDPSCs indicate their possible use in the regeneration of the dentin-pulp complex and support the critical role of angiogenesis and neurogenesis in pulp regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.