Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300882›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery2022

Application of human factors at hybrid meetings: facilitating productivity and inclusivity.

Ricky Ellis, Tim Goodacre, Neil Mortensen, Rachel S Oeppen, Peter A Brennan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricky EllisInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX,UK; Urology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. Electronic address: Ricky.ellis@doctors.org.uk.
Tim GoodacreRoyal College of Surgeons of England, 35/43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN, UK. Electronic address: tim.goodacre@queens.ox.ac.uk.
Neil MortensenRoyal College of Surgeons of England, 35/43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN, UK. Electronic address: neil.mortensen@nds.ox.ac.uk.
Rachel S OeppenDept of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. Electronic address: rachel.oeppen@uhs.nhs.uk.
Peter A BrennanMaxillofacial Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK. Electronic address: Peter.brennan@porthosp.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the widespread use of virtual meetings and conferences. As the healthcare sector attempts to return to normality, face-to-face meetings have started to resume. However, ongoing travel restrictions, risk of viral transmission, the Omicron variant, and requirements for self-isolation, have necessitated the use of novel hybrid meeting formats. These enable participants to attend either in person or virtually using various online platforms such as Microsoft Teams and Zoom. Well organised and facilitated hybrid meetings can combine the advantages of in-person meetings with virtual participation, although the dynamics of communication between attendees is considerably different. This article discusses the benefits and pitfalls of the hybrid format, the human factors that impact productivity and inclusivity, and how to address them in future meetings.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CommunicationHumansPandemicsCOVID-19Human FactorsHybrid meetingperformanceVirtual

Identifiers

PMID35300882
PMCPMC8721917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.