ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2022
A prospective, multicenter, clinical study of duodenoscope contamination after reprocessing.
Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical and clinical feasibility of single-use gastroscopy with real-time AI-based quality monitoring and single-use colonoscopy: a prospective two-center study.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Trial
- Comprehensive Review of How Endoscope Channel Biofilm Differs from Hydrated and Dry Surface Biofilm and Its Implications.Endoscopy international open · 2026Review
- Novel technology for automated cleaning of flexible endoscopes.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Sampling Methods for Detecting Protein in Gastrointestinal Endoscopes.Biomedical instrumentation & technology · 2024Article
- Article
- Investigation of the efficacy of an innovative endoscope drying and storage method in a simulated ERCP setting.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Search better and you will find more: an important lesson in endoscope contamination.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Letter to the Editor RE: Assessing nonsexual transmission of the human papillomavirus: Do our current cleaning methods work? By Tucker et al.Journal of medical virology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSeveral clinical procedures utilize duodenoscopes, which are processed for reuse after the procedures are completed. However, infection outbreaks due to improper duodenoscope processing occur frequently. To address this, we aimed to assess the contamination rates of duodenoscopes after reprocessing in nonoutbreak settings. DESIGN AND
settingProspective study in 16 clinical sites in the United States.
methodsWe sampled and cultured reprocessed duodenoscopes following the FDA/CDC/ASM guideline; "Duodenoscope Surveillance Sampling and Culturing - Reducing the Risks of Infection." High-concern (HC) organisms were those highly associated with disease, including gram-negative rods,
resultsWe assessed 859 newer-model (NM) duodenoscopes (TJF-Q180V) and 850 older-model (OM) duodenoscopes (TJF-160F/VF); of these, 35 NM samples (4.1%) and 56 OM samples (6.6%) were contaminated with HC organisms. We detected and classified the HC organisms as gastrointestinal (45.4%), human origin (16.7%), environmental (24.1%), waterborne (13.0%), and unidentified (0.9%).
conclusionsWe detected an overall HC contamination rate of 5.3% in nonoutbreak settings. Although the relationship between endoscopic contamination and the occurrence of infections remains unclear, attempts should continue to be made to further reduce contamination rates. Additional improvements to the manufacturer's instructions for use, human factors during the reprocessing procedure, ongoing training programs, cleanliness of reprocessing environments, and the design of the distal end of the duodenoscope should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.