Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300714›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2022

Trends in Canadian prescription drug purchasing: 2001-2020.

Mark Hofmeister, Ashwinie Sivakumar, Fiona Clement, Kaleen N Hayes, Michael Law, Jason R Guertin, Heather L Neville, Mina Tadrous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark HofmeisterDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ashwinie SivakumarLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Fiona ClementDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kaleen N HayesDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael LawCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jason R GuertinAxe Santé Des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Heather L NevilleQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. mina.tadrous@wchospital.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-6129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019, more than $34.5 billion was spent on prescription drugs in Canada. However, little is known about the distribution of this spending across medications and settings (outpatient and inpatient) over time. The objective of this paper is to describe the largest expenditures by medication class over time in inpatient and outpatient settings. This information can help to guide policies to control prescription medication expenditures.

methodsIQVIA's Canadian Drugstore and Hospital Purchases Audit data from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2020, were used. In this dataset, purchasing was stratified by outpatient drugstore and inpatient hospital. Spending trajectories in both settings were compared to total expenditure over time. Total expenditure of the 25 medications with the largest expenditure were compared over time, stratified by setting. Nominal costs were used for all analysis.

resultsIn 2001, spending in the outpatient and inpatient settings was greatest on atorvastatin ($467.0 million) and erythropoietin alpha ($91.2 million), respectively. In 2020, spending was greatest on infliximab at $1.2 billion (outpatient) and pembrolizumab at $361.6 million (inpatient). Annual outpatient spending, although increasing, has been growing at a slower rate (5.3%) than inpatient spending (7.0%). In both settings, spending for the top 25 medications has become increasingly concentrated on biologic agents, with a reduction in the diversity of therapeutic classes of agents over time. DISCUSSION: Identification of the concentration on spending on biologic agents is a key step in managing costs of prescription medications in Canada. Given the increases in spending on biologic agents over the last 20 years, current cost-control mechanisms may be insufficient. Future research efforts should focus on examining the effectiveness of current cost-control mechanisms and identifying new approaches to cost control for biologic agents.

Identifiers

PMID35300714
PMCPMC8928614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.