Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300593›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022

MELD-XI score predict no-reflow phenomenon and short-term mortality in patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Xin-Tao Zhang, Zhao-Rong Lin, Lin Zhang, Zi-Wen Zhao, Liang-Long Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Predictive Value of the MELD Scores for In-Hospital Adverse Events in Normotensive Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin-Tao ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Zhao-Rong LinDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Wen ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Liang-Long ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China. lianglongchenxh@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNo-reflow phenomenon (NRP) is one of the complications that mostly occur during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, we comprehensively examined the relationship between the model for end-stage liver disease-XI (MELD-XI) score and NRP. Moreover, we discussed whether the MELD-XI score could be considered as an accurate risk assessment score of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are candidates for PCI.

methodsThis retrospective study involved 693 patients with acute STEMI and who underwent an emergency PCI. They were divided into a normal reflow group or a no-reflow group on the basis of the flow rate of post-interventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of NRP in both groups. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to estimate the predictive values of the MELD-XI score.

resultsMELD-XI score was found to be an independent indicator of NRP (odds ratio: 1.247, 95% CI: 1.144-1.360, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed that the MELD-XI score is an independent prognostic factor for 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.155, 95% CI: 1.077-1.239, P < 0.001). Moreover, according to the ROC curves, the cutoff value of the MELD-XI score to predict NRP was 9.47 (area under ROC curve: 0.739, P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier curves for 30-day all-cause mortality revealed lower survival rate in the group with a MELD-XI score of > 9.78 (P < 0.001).

conclusionThe MELD-XI score can be used to predict NRP and the 30-day prognosis in patients with STEMI who are candidates for primary PCI. It could be adopted as an inexpensive and a readily available tool for risk stratification.

Indexed as

End Stage Liver DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionNo-Reflow PhenomenonPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCoronary AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexLiver and renal dysfunctionMELD-XINo-reflow phenomenonPercutaneous coronary interventionShort-term outcomeST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID35300593
PMCPMC8931958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.