Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300586›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Conservation of dynamic characteristics of transcriptional regulatory elements in periodic biological processes.

Francis C Motta, Robert C Moseley, Bree Cummins, Anastasia Deckard, Steven B Haase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of the Cell-Cycle Clock Models: Biochemical or Transcriptional?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francis C Motta *Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA. fmotta@fau.edu.
Robert C Moseley *Department of Biology, Duke University, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Bree CumminsDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 172400, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.
Anastasia DeckardGeometric Data Analytics, 343 W Main St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Steven B HaaseDepartment of Biology, Duke University, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Duke University · USData Management (Italy) · ITFlorida Atlantic University · USMontana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell and circadian cycles control a large fraction of cell and organismal physiology by regulating large periodic transcriptional programs that encompass anywhere from 15 to 80% of the genome despite performing distinct functions. In each case, these large periodic transcriptional programs are controlled by gene regulatory networks (GRNs), and it has been shown through genetics and chromosome mapping approaches in model systems that at the core of these GRNs are small sets of genes that drive the transcript dynamics of the GRNs. However, it is unlikely that we have identified all of these core genes, even in model organisms. Moreover, large periodic transcriptional programs controlling a variety of processes certainly exist in important non-model organisms where genetic approaches to identifying networks are expensive, time-consuming, or intractable. Ideally, the core network components could be identified using data-driven approaches on the transcriptome dynamics data already available.

resultsThis study shows that a unified set of quantified dynamic features of high-throughput time series gene expression data are more prominent in the core transcriptional regulators of cell and circadian cycles than in their outputs, in multiple organism, even in the presence of external periodic stimuli. Additionally, we observe that the power to discriminate between core and non-core genes is largely insensitive to the particular choice of quantification of these features.

conclusionsThere are practical applications of the approach presented in this study for network inference, since the result is a ranking of genes that is enriched for core regulatory elements driving a periodic phenotype. In this way, the method provides a prioritization of follow-up genetic experiments. Furthermore, these findings reveal something unexpected-that there are shared dynamic features of the transcript abundance of core components of unrelated GRNs that control disparate periodic phenotypes.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmGene Regulatory NetworksRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalBiological PhenomenaGenomeTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsCell cycleCircadian rhythmsGene regulatory networksNetwork inferenceTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID35300586
PMCPMC8932128
OpenAlexW4220917935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.