Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300446›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism

Video Consultation Versus In-Person Clinic Visit for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes during COVID-19 Pandemic (VIP-CD Study).

Aditya Dutta, Shama Mahendru, Rutuja Sharma, Anshu Singh, Anjali Jain, Ganesh Jevalikar, Ambrish Mithal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya DuttaInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Shama MahendruInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Rutuja SharmaInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Anshu SinghInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Anjali JainInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Ganesh JevalikarInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Ambrish MithalInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Max Healthcare, New Delhi, India.
Max Healthcare · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of video consultation (VC) for prospective glycemic control against that of in-person clinic visit (IPV) in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, cohort study of 96 individuals with type 2 diabetes followed up for a period of ≤6 months. The cohort was divided into two groups depending on the mode of consultation, namely IPV ( Results: The cohort had a mean age of 55.4 ± 13.8 years, median diabetes duration of 8 (0.3-70) years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.8 ± 5.8 kg/m Conclusions: Telemedicine is an effective mode of consultation for attaining glycemic control during COVID-19 pandemic, possibly owing to the quicker follow-up without the risk of potential in-clinic/hospital exposure to COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19telemedicinetype 2 diabetesvideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID35300446
PMCPMC8923318
OpenAlexW4205302626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.