ArticleADMET & DMPK2021
ADME prediction with KNIME: A retrospective contribution to the second "Solubility Challenge".
Article in ADMET & DMPK, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Correlation between Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Crystalline Solubility of Drug-Like Molecules.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Intrinsic Aqueous Solubility: Mechanistically Transparent Data-Driven Modeling of Drug Substances.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Implementation of an AI-assisted fragment-generator in an open-source platform.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational models for predicting aqueous solubility from the molecular structure represent a promising strategy from the perspective of drug design and discovery. Since the first "Solubility Challenge", these initiatives have marked the state-of-art of the modelling algorithms used to predict drug solubility. In this regard, the quality of the input experimental data and its influence on model performance has been frequently discussed. In our previous study, we developed a computational model for aqueous solubility based on recursive random forest approaches. The aim of the current commentary is to analyse the performance of this already trained predictive model on the molecules of the second "Solubility Challenge". Even when our training set has inconsistencies related to the pH, solid form and temperature conditions of the solubility measurements, the model was able to predict the two sets from the second "Solubility Challenge" with statistics comparable to those of the top ranked models. Finally, we provided a KNIME automated workflow to predict aqueous solubility of new drug candidates, during the early stages of drug discovery and development, for ensuring the applicability and reproducibility of our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.