Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300220›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Heat Stress-Induced Dysbiosis of Porcine Colon Microbiota Plays a Role in Intestinal Damage: A Fecal Microbiota Profile.

Canying Hu, Yadnyavalkya Patil, Dongliang Gong, Tianyue Yu, Junyu Li, Lianyun Wu, Xiaoxi Liu, Zhichao Yu, Xinbing Ma, Yanhong Yong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The gastrointestinal microbiome in critical illness: A Clinician's guide to mechanisms, emerging tools, and therapeutic questions.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Canying HuDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Yadnyavalkya PatilDepartment of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Dongliang GongDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Tianyue YuDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Junyu LiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Lianyun WuDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xiaoxi LiuDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Zhichao YuDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xinbing MaDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Yanhong YongDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Jinjun ChenDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Ravi GooneratneDepartment of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Xianghong JuDepartment of Animal Science, Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Guangdong Ocean University · CNLincoln University · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathological mechanisms of gastrointestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in pigs are poorly understood. We report the induction of intestinal inflammation in heat-stressed (HS) pigs, fecal microbiota transplantation from pigs to mice, and explain the role of microorganisms in IBD. 24 adult pigs were subjected to HS (34 ± 1 °C; 75-85% relative humidity for 24h) while 24 control pigs (CP) were kept at 25 ± 3°C and the same humidity. Pigs were sacrificed on days 1, 7, 14, 21. Colonic content microbiome analyses were conducted. Pseudo-germ-free mice were fed by gavage with fecal microbiota from HS-pigs and CP to induce pig-like responses in mice. From 7 d, HS-pigs exhibited fever and diarrhea, and significantly lower colonic mucosal thickness, crypt depth/width, and goblet cell number. Compared with each control group, the concentration of cortisol in the peripheral blood of HS pigs gradually increased, significantly so on days 7, 14, and 21 (P < 0.01). While the concentration of LPS in HS pigs' peripheral blood was significantly higher on days 7, 14 (P < 0.01), and 21 (P < 0.05) compared with that of the control group. The colonic microbiome composition of HS-pigs was different to that of CP. By day 14, opportunistic pathogens (e.g.,

Indexed as

colonic microbiomeheat stressinflammation in the colonmicepigs

Identifiers

PMID35300220
PMCPMC8921775
OpenAlexW4214643241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.