Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300208›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2022

Regorafenib Combined with PD-1 Blockade Immunotherapy versus Regorafenib as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Jingjun Huang, Yongjian Guo, Wensou Huang, Xiaotao Hong, Yi Quan, Liteng Lin, Jingwen Zhou, Licong Liang, Yaqin Zhang, Juan Zhou and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of standardized second-line drugs for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical predictive factors of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jingjun Huang *Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2582-6629
Yongjian Guo *Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Wensou Huang *Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7412-6285
Xiaotao HongDepartment of Interventional Medical Center, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yi QuanDepartment of Oncology Medical Center, The First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Liteng LinDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jingwen ZhouDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Licong LiangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yaqin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Juan ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Mingyue CaiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Kangshun ZhuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5142-010X
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNPeople 's Hospital of Jilin Province · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab (rego-sintilimab) as a second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received rego-sintilimab (rego-sintilimab group) or regorafenib alone (regorafenib group) as a second-line treatment from January 2019 to December 2020. Adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Uni- and multi-variable analyses of prognostic factors for OS and PFS were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: In total, 113 patients were included in the study: 58 received rego-sintilimab and 55 received regorafenib. The rego-sintilimab group had higher ORR (36.2% vs 16.4%, Conclusion: Rego-sintilimab was tolerated and led to better OS than regorafenib as a second-line treatment for advanced HCC patients, especially in those with NLR ≤ 3.6.

Indexed as

anti-PD-1 antibodyliver cancerneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratiooverall survivalregorafenibsecond-line treatment

Identifiers

PMID35300208
PMCPMC8922463
OpenAlexW4221016138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.