Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300126›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Rebamipide as a Potential Alternative Gastroprotective Agent to Proton Pump Inhibitor in Elderly Chronic Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Users without Risk Factors.

Mee Yeon Lee, Suhyun Lee, Kyu-Nam Heo, Woo-Youn Kim, Sun Hoi Jung, Young-Mi Ah, Ju-Yeun Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Rebamipide in gastric mucosal protection and healing: An Asian perspective.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mee Yeon LeeCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suhyun LeeCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyu-Nam HeoCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Youn KimCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun Hoi JungDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Mi AhCollege of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1607-9828
Ju-Yeun LeeCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-7330
Seoul National University · KRYeungnam University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is recommended to prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal (GI) complications. The incidence of several adverse effects during the long-term use of PPI prompts the search for other alternatives. Limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of rebamipide, a widely used mucoprotective drug, as a gastroprotective agent (GPA) compared to PPI, focusing on the elderly chronic NSAID users, nor with GI risk stratification. We aimed to determine the population who would get benefit from the use of rebamipide as an alternative to PPI to prevent traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (tNSAID)-associated GI complications. Patients and Methods: We identified 41,889 and 35,708 elderly chronic tNSAID users with PPI and rebamipide co-therapy, respectively, from the national claims database. Outcome was defined as hospitalization or emergency department visits due to serious GI complications. Propensity score-matched cohorts were constructed and compared within risk strata. Results: In high and moderate risk groups with two risk factors, rebamipide showed a higher risk of serious GI complication compared to PPI (aHR 2.63, 95% CI 1.24-5.59 and aHR 2.42, 95% CI 1.21-4.83, respectively). However, in elderly patients without risk factors, there was no significant difference in the risk of serious GI complications between PPI and rebamipide (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27-1.76). Conclusion: This study suggested that rebamipide can be considered as an alternative to PPI in elderly chronic tNSAID users without risk factors. However, elderly patients with other risk factors should use PPI rather than rebamipide. Therefore, the presence of GI risk factors needs to be evaluated in elderly chronic tNSAID users to prescribe the most suitable GPA in clinical practice.

Indexed as

agedgastroprotective agentnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugrebamipiderisk group

Identifiers

PMID35300126
PMCPMC8922238
OpenAlexW4220738395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.