ArticleJournal of computational physics2022
On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method.
Article in Journal of computational physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Composite B-spline regularized delta functions for the immersed boundary method: Divergence-free interpolation and gradient-preserving force spreading.Journal of computational physics · 2026Article
- A numerical framework for preprocedural prosthetic valve positioning and hemodynamic evaluation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- LOCAL DIVERGENCE-FREE IMMERSED FINITE ELEMENT-DIFFERENCE METHOD USING COMPOSITE B-SPLINES.Advances in computational science and engineering · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction modelling of the venous valve using immersed boundary/finite element method.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Flagellum Pumping Efficiency in Shear-Thinning Viscoelastic Fluids.Journal of fluid mechanics · 2024Article
- Simulating cardiac fluid dynamics in the human heart.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Benchmarking the Immersed Boundary Method for Viscoelastic Flows.Journal of computational physics · 2024Article
- A sharp interface Lagrangian-Eulerian method for flexible-body fluid-structure interaction.Journal of computational physics · 2023Article
- Modeling Dynamics of the Cardiovascular System Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Methods.Biology · 2023Review
- A model of fluid-structure and biochemical interactions for applications to subclinical leaflet thrombosis.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The immersed boundary (IB) method is a non-body conforming approach to fluid-structure interaction (FSI) that uses an Eulerian description of the momentum, viscosity, and incompressibility of a coupled fluid-structure system and a Lagrangian description of the deformations, stresses, and resultant forces of the immersed structure. Integral transforms with Dirac delta function kernels couple the Eulerian and Lagrangian variables, and in practice, discretizations of these integral transforms use regularized delta function kernels. Many different kernel functions have been proposed, but prior numerical work investigating the impact of the choice of kernel function on the accuracy of the methodology has often been limited to simplified test cases or Stokes flow conditions that may not reflect the method's performance in applications, particularly at intermediate-to-high Reynolds numbers, or under different loading conditions. This work systematically studies the effect of the choice of regularized delta function in several fluid-structure interaction benchmark tests using the immersed finite element/difference (IFED) method, which is an extension of the IB method that uses a finite element structural discretization combined with a Cartesian grid finite difference method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Whereas the conventional IB method spreads forces from the nodes of the structural mesh and interpolates velocities to those nodes, the IFED formulation evaluates the regularized delta function on a collection of interaction points that can be chosen to be denser than the nodes of the Lagrangian mesh. This opens the possibility of using structural discretizations with wide node spacings that would produce gaps in the Eulerian force in nodally coupled schemes (e.g., if the node spacing is comparable to or broader than the support of the regularized delta functions). Earlier work with this methodology suggested that such coarse structural meshes can yield improved accuracy for shear-dominated cases and, further, found that accuracy improves when the structural mesh spacing is
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.