Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300031›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation - A Review.

Mohammed Alawad, Abdulrhman Aljouie, Suhailah Alamri, Mansour Alghamdi, Balsam Alabdulkader, Norah Alkanhal, Ahmed Almazroa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Robust Uncertainty-Informed Glaucoma Classification Under Data Shift.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed AlawadDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrhman AljouieDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5592-2462
Suhailah AlamriDepartment of Imaging Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour AlghamdiDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9389-4722
Balsam AlabdulkaderDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-7866
Norah AlkanhalDepartment of Imaging Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlmazroaDepartment of Imaging Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8854-6344
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness. Detecting glaucoma in the early stages is essential to avoid disease complications, which lead to blindness. Thus, computer-aided diagnosis systems are powerful tools to overcome the shortage of glaucoma screening programs. Methods: A systematic search of public databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and other sources, was performed to identify relevant studies to overview the publicly available fundus image datasets used to train, validate, and test machine learning and deep learning methods. Additionally, existing machine learning and deep learning methods for optic cup and disc segmentation were surveyed and critically reviewed. Results: Eight fundus images datasets were publicly available with 15,445 images labeled with glaucoma or non-glaucoma, and manually annotated optic disc and cup boundaries were found. Five metrics were identified for evaluating the developed models. Finally, three main deep learning architectural designs were commonly used for optic disc and optic cup segmentation. Conclusion: We provided future research directions to formulate robust optic cup and disc segmentation systems. Deep learning can be utilized in clinical settings for this task. However, many challenges need to be addressed before using this strategy in clinical trials. Finally, two deep learning architectural designs have been widely adopted, such as U-net and its variants.

Indexed as

big images datafundus imagesglaucomaglaucoma screening

Identifiers

PMID35300031
PMCPMC8923700
OpenAlexW4221009319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.