Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300013›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2022

A Global Network Meta-Analysis of the Promotion of Crop Growth, Yield, and Quality by Bioeffectors.

Michelle Natalie Herrmann, Yuan Wang, Jens Hartung, Tobias Hartmann, Wei Zhang, Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe, Xinping Chen, Torsten Müller, Huaiyu Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle Natalie HerrmannCollege of Resources and Environment, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yuan WangCollege of Resources and Environment, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jens HartungInstitute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Tobias HartmannInstitute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Wei ZhangCollege of Resources and Environment, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Peteh Mehdi NkebiweInstitute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Xinping ChenCollege of Resources and Environment, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Torsten MüllerInstitute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Huaiyu YangCollege of Resources and Environment, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
University of Hohenheim · DESouthwest University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioeffector (BE) application is emerging as a strategy for achieving sustainable agricultural practices worldwide. However, the effect of BE on crop growth and quality is still controversial and there is still no adequate impact assessment that determines factors on the efficiency of BE application. Therefore, we carried out a network metaanalysis on the effect of BEs using 1,791 global observations from 186 studies to summarize influencing factors and the impact of BEs on crop growth, quality, and nutrient contents. The results show that BEs did not only improve plant growth by around 25% and yield by 30%, but also enhanced crop quality, e.g., protein (55% increase) and soluble solids content (75% increase) as well as aboveground nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) content by 28 and 40%, respectively. The comparisons among BE types demonstrated that especially non-microbial products, such as extracts and humic/amino acids, have the potential to increase biomass growth by 40-60% and aboveground P content by 54-110%. The soil pH strongly influenced the efficiency of the applied BE with the highest effects in acidic soils. Our results showed that BEs are most suitable for promoting the quality of legumes and increasing the yield of fruits, herbs, and legumes. We illustrate that it is crucial to optimize the application of BEs with respect to the right application time and technique (e.g., placement, foliar). Our results provide an important basis for future research on the mechanisms underlying crop improvement by the application of BEs and on the development of new BE products.

Indexed as

biofertilizersbiostimulantsnutrient use efficiencyPGPRpHsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID35300013
PMCPMC8921507
OpenAlexW4214555154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.