Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35299887›Full record

ArticleJournal of family studies2022

Examining Women's and Men's Ideal Criteria Before Forming Families.

Meredith G Manze, Dana Watnick, Catherine Besthoff, Diana Romero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meredith G ManzeCity University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, New York, NY.
Dana WatnickCity University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, New York, NY.
Catherine BesthoffMount Sinai West, New York, NY.
Diana RomeroCity University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, New York, NY.

Funding

Fertility & Disadvantage Among Low-Income Adults: A Mixed Methods ApproachK01HD055263 · NICHD · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI ROMERO, DIANA · 2008 to 2012
$565k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD055263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, family formation decision-making is more complex than the predominant models that have been used to capture this phenomenon. Understanding the context in which a pregnancy occurs requires a more nuanced examination. In-depth interviews were conducted with 60 men and women, aged 18-35, who had children or were pregnant. Using grounded theory analysis, themes emerged that revealed participants' ideal criteria desired before pregnancy. We stratified by those who met and did not meet these criteria. Almost universally, participants shared ideal criteria: to graduate, gain financial stability, establish a relationship, and then become pregnant. Many participants did not accomplish these goals. Those who had not met their criteria had experienced traumatic childhoods and suffered economic concerns. For this group, having children prompted positive changes within their control, but financial stability remained limited. Efforts should focus on improving circumstances for all individuals to fulfill their criteria before pregnancy.

Indexed as

family healthfamily planningpregnancyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35299887
PMCPMC8923530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.