ArticleDisease markers2022
Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Nine Patients with Severe Multiple Injuries Accompanied by Traumatic Aortic Dissection during Emergency Treatment.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thoracic blunt trauma causing fatal cardiac rupture and aortic dissection: A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
- Retracted: Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Nine Patients with Severe Multiple Injuries Accompanied by Traumatic Aortic Dissection during Emergency Treatment.Disease markers · 2023Article
- Traumatic blunt thoracic aortic injury: a 10-year single-center retrospective analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8C73F7EC5B808BB83131BB7CDCD064
- Retracted
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study is aimed at investigating the early diagnosis and efficacy of emergency treatments of nine patients with severe multiple injuries accompanied by traumatic aortic dissection (TAD). Methods: Patients who sustained severe multiple injuries accompanied by TAD following a car accident ( Results: This study included nine patients suffering from severe multiple injuries accompanied by Stanford type B TAD, with injury severity scores ranging from 35 to 43 points. Six patients underwent EVGE while receiving emergency treatment, whereas two patients who also had intracranial haemorrhage underwent selective EVGE. One case of TAD missed in the emergency department was detected 13 days after hospitalisation; therefore, the patient promptly underwent EVGE. Emergency procedures performed included exploratory laparotomy and splenectomy ( Conclusion: In this study, procedures including resuscitation, urgent aortic CTA for definitive diagnosis, prompt EVGE, emergency injury control surgery, second-stage definitive surgery, intensive care treatment, and rehabilitation were rationally performed by the emergency MDT trauma team. Overall, this continuous and seamless process is a key factor for the successful treatment of patients with severe multiple injuries accompanied by TAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.