Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35299843›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022

Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Maddalena De Bernardo, Livio Vitiello, Ilaria De Pascale, Luigi Capasso, Palmiro Cornetta, Nicola Rosa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Children: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maddalena De BernardoEye Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana, " University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Livio VitielloEye Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana, " University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Ilaria De PascaleEye Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana, " University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Luigi CapassoCorneal Transplant Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 1, Naples, Italy.
Palmiro CornettaEye Unit, "Maria SS Addolorata" Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Nicola RosaEye Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana, " University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
University of Salerno · ITASL Roma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disease with a heterogeneity of possible causes, which needs to be quickly diagnosed. Ocular ultrasonography could be considered a useful tool to diagnose this condition in a fast and non-invasive way. In fact, Karl Ossoinig had already proposed this diagnostic tool in the 1970s for the evaluation of intracranial pressure changes under several pathological conditions, including idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The aim of this review is to analyze scientific articles published in the last 30 years concerning the use of ocular ultrasonography to assess optic nerve indices in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Specifically, 15 published articles found in PubMed database were included and analyzed in the present review. Our conclusion suggests that ocular ultrasonography is a reliable diagnostic technique to be utilized in all the cases of suspected raised intracranial pressure. To obtain the best possible accuracy and precision in the least invasive way, standardized A-scan seems to be the best choice.

Indexed as

idiopathic intracranial hypertensionONSDoptic nerveoptic nerve sheath diameterultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35299843
PMCPMC8921495
OpenAlexW4214738049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.