Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35299778›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2022

Spontaneous spinal cord infarction in Austria: a two-center comparative study.

Slaven Pikija, Alexander B Kunz, Raffaele Nardone, Christian Enzinger, Johannes A R Pfaff, Eugen Trinka, Thomas Seifert-Held, Johann Sellner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thrombolysis in spinal cord infarction: Case report and systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hypotension-Induced Transverse Spinal Cord Ischemia.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Slaven PikijaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Alexander B KunzDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Raffaele NardoneKarl Landsteiner Institute for Neurorehabilitation and Space Neurology, Salzburg, Austria.
Christian EnzingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Johannes A R PfaffUniversity Institute for Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neurorehabilitation and Space Neurology, Salzburg, Austria Neuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler Medical Center and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas Seifert-HeldDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Johann SellnerDepartment of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstr. 67, 2130 Mistelbach, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-5533
Paracelsus Medical University · ATMedical University of Graz · ATKrankenhaus Meran · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord infarction (SCI) is a neurological emergency associated with high rates of persistent neurological deficits. Knowledge about this rare but potentially treatable condition needs to be expanded. Objective: To describe the characteristics of spontaneous SCI in a large retrospective series of patients treated at two tertiary care centers in Austria. Methods: We performed a descriptive and comparative analysis of spontaneous SCI treated at the University Hospitals of Salzburg and Graz between the years 2000 and 2020. The analysis included pre- and in-hospital procedures, clinical presentation, etiology, diagnostic certainty, reperfusion therapy, and functional outcome at discharge. Results: We identified 88 cases, 61% were ascertained in the second half of the study period. The median age was 65.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 56-74], 51.1% were women. Anterior spinal artery infarction was the predominant syndrome (82.9%). Demographics, vascular comorbidities, and clinical presentation did not differ between the centers. The most frequent etiology and level of diagnostic certainty were distinct, with atherosclerosis (50%) and definite SCI (42%), and unknown (52.5%) and probable SCI (60%) as front runners in Salzburg and Graz, respectively. Patients arrived after a median of 258.5 min (IQR = 110-528) at the emergency room. The first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spinal cord was performed after a median of 148 min (IQR = 90-312) from admission and was diagnostic for SCI in 45%. Two patients received intravenous thrombolysis (2.2%). The outcome was poor in 37/77 (48%). Conclusion: Demographics, clinical syndromes, and quality benchmarks for spontaneous SCI were consistent at two Austrian tertiary care centers. Our findings provide the foundation for establishing standards for pre- and in-hospital care to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

ischemic myelopathyoutcomeparaplegiaspinal cord infarctionstroke

Identifiers

PMID35299778
PMCPMC8921761
OpenAlexW4225996518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.