ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
What Can Make the Difference Between Chronotypes in Sleep Duration? Testing the Similarity of Their Homeostatic Processes.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemispheric efficiency during the day: the influence of circadian preference and time-of-day on verbal and visuospatial tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Toward a Classification of Chronotype Questionnaires.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- The Association Between Mental Health Indices and the Chronotypes Measured by Single-Item Chronotyping in Young Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Weekday and weekend sleep times across the human lifespan: a model-based simulation.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Weekend sleep after early and later school start times confirmed a model-predicted failure to catch up sleep missed on weekdays.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
- Reaction of the endogenous regulatory mechanisms to early weekday wakeups: a review of its popular explanations in light of model-based simulations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The two-process conceptualization of sleep-wake regulation suggests that the biological underpinnings of the differences between morning and evening types in sleep timing and duration might be related to either the circadian process or the homeostatic process or both. The purpose of this report was to test whether morning and evening types might have similar homeostatic processes to achieve such ultimate goal of homeostatic sleep regulation as taking an adequate amount of sleep on free days. Weekend and weekday rise- and bedtimes reported for 50 paired samples of morning and evening types were averaged and simulated with a model of sleep-wake regulation. In morning and evening types of the same age, the homeostatic components of the sleep-wake regulation were found to be identical. Therefore, the difference in the circadian process between chronotypes of similar age can account for the observed differences between them in sleep timing and duration on weekdays and weekends. It was also demonstrated that the model-based simulations might have practical implications for informing an individual about the extent of unrecoverable reduction of his/her sleep on weekdays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.