Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35299618›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2022

Mechanisms of Surround Suppression Effect on the Contrast Sensitivity of V1 Neurons in Cats.

Hao Yu, Fei Xu, Xiangmei Hu, Yanni Tu, Qiuyu Zhang, Zheng Ye, Tianmiao Hua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao YuCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Fei XuCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Xiangmei HuCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Yanni TuCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Qiuyu ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Zheng YeCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Tianmiao HuaCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-2756
Anhui Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surround suppression (SS) is a phenomenon that a neuron's response to visual stimuli within the classical receptive field (cRF) is suppressed by a concurrent stimulation in the surrounding receptive field (sRF) beyond the cRF. Studies show that SS affects neuronal response contrast sensitivity in the primary visual cortex (V1). However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we examined SS effect on the contrast sensitivity of cats' V1 neurons with different preferred SFs using external noise-masked visual stimuli and perceptual template model (PTM) analysis at the system level. The contrast sensitivity was evaluated by the inverted threshold contrast of neurons in response to circular gratings of different contrasts in the cRF with or without an annular grating in the sRF. Our results showed that SS significantly reduced the contrast sensitivity of cats' V1 neurons. The SS-induced reduction of contrast sensitivity was not correlated with SS strength but was dependent on neuron's preferred SF, with a larger reduction for neurons with low preferred SFs than those with high preferred SFs. PTM analysis of threshold versus external noise contrast (TvC) functions indicated that SS decreased contrast sensitivity by increasing both the internal additive noise and impact of external noise for neurons with low preferred SFs, but improving only internal additive noise for neurons with high preferred SFs. Furthermore, the SS effect on the contrast-response function of low- and high-SF neurons also exhibited different mechanisms in contrast gain and response gain. Collectively, these results suggest that the mechanisms of SS effect on neuronal contrast sensitivity may depend on neuronal populations with different SFs.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityVisual CortexAnimalsCatsNeuronsPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35299618
PMCPMC8923783
OpenAlexW4220702433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.