Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35299599›Full record

ArticleGates open research2020

Technical assistance: a practical account of the challenges in design and implementation.

Alexandra Nastase, Alok Rajan, Ben French, Debarshi Bhattacharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra NastaseOxford Policy Management, Oxford, UK.
Alok RajanOxford Policy Management, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1396-176X
Ben FrenchOxford Policy Management, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-5331
Debarshi BhattacharyaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-353X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technical assistance is provided to country governments as part of international development programmes to support policymaking or strengthen state capability. This article presents the conceptual evolution of 'technical assistance' linked to capacity development, starting with programmes aiming exclusively to enhance individual capacity in the 1950s to 1970s and progressing to complex systems approaches in the past ten years. It also presents some of the frequent challenges in designing and implementing technical assistance, drawing from the existing literature and the authors' experience in international development. The article summarises the latest thinking about delivering more effective development, including the adaptive management practices and the initiatives to strengthen evidence about what works. Finally, we complement this article with a follow-up open letter reflecting on the current policy options and opportunities for change.

Indexed as

capacity developmentcapacity substitutioncapacity supplementationinternational developmentpolicy optionsstate capabilitytechnical assistance

Identifiers

PMID35299599
PMCPMC8920999.2

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.