ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2022
Cascaded mutual enhancing networks for brain tumor subregion segmentation in multiparametric MRI.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Pooled it
- Detection and segmentation of brain metastases on MRI using 3D-MedDCNet.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Brain tumor segmentation using multi-scale attention U-Net with EfficientNetB4 encoder for enhanced MRI analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cascade Residual Multiscale Convolution and Mamba-Structured UNet for Advanced Brain Tumor Image Segmentation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic segmentation of neurovascular bundle on mri using deep learning based topological modulated network.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of glioma and its subregions plays an important role in radiotherapy treatment planning. Due to a very populated multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging image, manual segmentation tasks can be very time-consuming, meticulous, and prone to subjective errors. Here, we propose a novel deep learning framework based on mutual enhancing networks to automatically segment brain tumor subregions. The proposed framework is suitable for the segmentation of brain tumor subregions owing to the contribution of Retina U-Net followed by the implementation of a mutual enhancing strategy between the classification localization map (CLM) module and segmentation module. Retina U-Net is trained to accurately identify view-of-interest and feature maps of the whole tumor (WT), which are then transferred to the CLM module and segmentation module. Subsequently, CLM generated by the CLM module is integrated with the segmentation module to bring forth a mutual enhancing strategy. In this way, our proposed framework first focuses on WT through Retina U-Net, and since WT consists of subregions, a mutual enhancing strategy then further aims to classify and segment subregions embedded within WT. We implemented and evaluated our proposed framework on the BraTS 2020 dataset consisting of 369 cases. We performed a 5-fold cross-validation on 200 datasets and a hold-out test on the remaining 169 cases. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our network design, we compared our method against the networks without Retina U-Net, mutual enhancing strategy, and a recently published Cascaded U-Net architecture. Results of all four methods were compared to the ground truth for segmentation and localization accuracies. Our method yielded significantly (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.