Trial reportClinical implant dentistry and related research2022
Histological and dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction when using collagen matrix and collagen-embedded xenogenic bone substitute: A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Fibro-Gide or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Trial
- Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation at the infected molar sites: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2023Trial
- Influence of healing time on the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation using a collagenated bovine bone xenograft: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2023Trial
- Alveolar ridge preservation in post-extraction sockets using concentrated growth factors: a split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Trial
- Histological and dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction when using collagen matrix and collagen-embedded xenogenic bone substitute: A randomized clinical trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2022Trial
- Five-Year Retrospective Radiographic Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Stability: A Comparison Between Two Socket Preservation Protocols and Spontaneous Healing.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- The success rate and aesthetic outcomes of immediate anterior implant placement based on primary stability: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Predictability, Skeletal Stability, and Safety of Iliac Crest Bone Grafts in Large Maxillary Advancement with Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation using collagen and platelet-rich fibrin: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Comparative effectiveness of autologous particulate dentin graft for alveolar ridge preservation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Histological Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Clinical evaluation of implants placed within or beyond the boundaries of the alveolar ridge preservation: a retrospective case series with 10 weeks of observations in 28 patients.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- L-shape technique with concentrated growth factor for horizontal bone defects in the maxillary anterior region: a clinical and radiographic study.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Article
- Changes of the Alveolar Bone Ridge Using Bone Mineral Grafts and Collagen Membranes after Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Mechanically Reinforced Super Bone Glue Makes a Leap in Hard Tissue Strong Adhesion and Augmented Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo assess the horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge when using a collagen matrix in combination with collagen embedded xenogenic bone substitute, in comparison with natural healing after tooth extraction.
methodsPatients that required extraction in non-molars areas were included. Test group-15 sockets were treated with deproteinized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C), covered by a procaine collagen membrane (CMXs). Control group-15 sockets left for spontaneous healing. We used a custom-made acrylic stent as a reference for alveolar ridge measurements. Six-month postoperative, a single implant was placed in the experimental site. A core biopsy was taken from the site, using a trephine bur. Histomorphometric analysis assessed bone area, connective tissue, bone marrow, and residual bone graft.
resultsSix months later, horizontal ridge width at -3 mm showed a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in both groups albeit smaller in the test group 1.19 ± 1.55 mm, compared with the control 2.27 ± 1.52 (p = 0.087). At -5 mm sub-crestally, statistically non-significant reduction was noted in both groups, 1.61 ± 1.53 and 1.96 ± 1.52 mm for the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.542). Vertical changes were smaller in the test group (0.14 ± 1.84 mm) compared with control (0.98 ± 1.49 mm). Keratinized tissue (KT) width was 7.3 ± 2.13 and 7.5 ± 3.49 mm in the test and control groups, respectively. Newly formed bone occupied 33.79 ± 17.37% and 51.14 ± 23.04% in the test and control groups, respectively, (p = 0.11). Connective tissue volume was 33.74 ± 13.81% and 30.12 ± 18.32% in the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.65). Bone marrow occupied 19.57 ± 10.26% and 18.74 ± 17.15% in the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.91). Residual graft occupied 12.9 ± 9.88% in the test group.
conclusionAlveolar ridge preservation using DBBM-C resulted in reductions of the vertical and horizontal dimensions albeit not reaching statistical significance. The larger than anticipated standard deviation and smaller inter-group differences might account for this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.