Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298865›Full record

Trial reportClinical implant dentistry and related research2022

Histological and dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction when using collagen matrix and collagen-embedded xenogenic bone substitute: A randomized clinical trial.

Eran Gabay, Anat Katorza, Hdar Zigdon-Giladi, Jacob Horwitz, Eli E Machtei

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. L-shape technique with concentrated growth factor for horizontal bone defects in the maxillary anterior region: a clinical and radiographic study.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eran GabayRambam Health Care Campus, Department of Periodontology and Implant dentistry, Haifa, Israel.
Anat KatorzaRambam Health Care Campus, Department of Periodontology and Implant dentistry, Haifa, Israel.
Hdar Zigdon-GiladiRambam Health Care Campus, Department of Periodontology and Implant dentistry, Haifa, Israel.
Jacob HorwitzRambam Health Care Campus, Department of Periodontology and Implant dentistry, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-8728
Eli E MachteiRambam Health Care Campus, Department of Periodontology and Implant dentistry, Haifa, Israel.
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILRambam Health Care Campus · IL

Funding

Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge when using a collagen matrix in combination with collagen embedded xenogenic bone substitute, in comparison with natural healing after tooth extraction.

methodsPatients that required extraction in non-molars areas were included. Test group-15 sockets were treated with deproteinized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C), covered by a procaine collagen membrane (CMXs). Control group-15 sockets left for spontaneous healing. We used a custom-made acrylic stent as a reference for alveolar ridge measurements. Six-month postoperative, a single implant was placed in the experimental site. A core biopsy was taken from the site, using a trephine bur. Histomorphometric analysis assessed bone area, connective tissue, bone marrow, and residual bone graft.

resultsSix months later, horizontal ridge width at -3 mm showed a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in both groups albeit smaller in the test group 1.19 ± 1.55 mm, compared with the control 2.27 ± 1.52 (p = 0.087). At -5 mm sub-crestally, statistically non-significant reduction was noted in both groups, 1.61 ± 1.53 and 1.96 ± 1.52 mm for the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.542). Vertical changes were smaller in the test group (0.14 ± 1.84 mm) compared with control (0.98 ± 1.49 mm). Keratinized tissue (KT) width was 7.3 ± 2.13 and 7.5 ± 3.49 mm in the test and control groups, respectively. Newly formed bone occupied 33.79 ± 17.37% and 51.14 ± 23.04% in the test and control groups, respectively, (p = 0.11). Connective tissue volume was 33.74 ± 13.81% and 30.12 ± 18.32% in the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.65). Bone marrow occupied 19.57 ± 10.26% and 18.74 ± 17.15% in the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.91). Residual graft occupied 12.9 ± 9.88% in the test group.

conclusionAlveolar ridge preservation using DBBM-C resulted in reductions of the vertical and horizontal dimensions albeit not reaching statistical significance. The larger than anticipated standard deviation and smaller inter-group differences might account for this phenomenon.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossAlveolar Ridge AugmentationBone SubstitutesAlveolar ProcessAnimalsCattleCollagenHumansTooth ExtractionTooth SocketBone SubstitutesCollagenalveolar ridge dimensionsalveolar ridge preservationcollagen embedded xenogenic bone substitutecore biopsynon-molars area

Identifiers

PMID35298865
PMCPMC9310752
OpenAlexW4220896626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.