Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298822›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Computational Design of Miniprotein Binders.

Younes Bouchiba, Manon Ruffini, Thomas Schiex, Sophie Barbe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Computational design of BclxL inhibitors that target transmembrane domain interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Younes BouchibaTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, ANITI, Toulouse, France.
Manon RuffiniTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, ANITI, Toulouse, France.
Thomas SchiexUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse, ANITI, INRAE, UR 875, Toulouse, France.
Sophie BarbeTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, ANITI, Toulouse, France. sophie.barbe@insa-toulouse.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniprotein binders hold a great interest as a class of drugs that bridges the gap between monoclonal antibodies and small molecule drugs. Like monoclonal antibodies, they can be designed to bind to therapeutic targets with high affinity, but they are more stable and easier to produce and to administer. In this chapter, we present a structure-based computational generic approach for miniprotein inhibitor design. Specifically, we describe step-by-step the implementation of the approach for the design of miniprotein binders against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, using available structural data on the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD) in interaction with its native target, the human receptor ACE2. Structural data being increasingly accessible around many protein-protein interaction systems, this method might be applied to the design of miniprotein binders against numerous therapeutic targets. The computational pipeline exploits provable and deterministic artificial intelligence-based protein design methods, with some recent additions in terms of binding energy estimation, multistate design and diverse library generation.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusArtificial IntelligenceHumansProtein BindingProtein DomainsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Binding affinityComputational protein designMiniprotein bindersMultistate protein designProtein–protein interaction, SARS-CoV-2.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.