Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298821›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Computational Evolution Protocol for Peptide Design.

Rodrigo Ochoa, Miguel A Soler, Ivan Gladich, Anna Battisti, Nikola Minovski, Alex Rodriguez, Sara Fortuna, Pilar Cossio, Alessandro Laio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rodrigo OchoaBiophysics of Tropical Diseases, Max Planck Tandem Group, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Miguel A SolerItalian Institute of Technology (IIT), Genova, Italy.
Ivan GladichQatar Environment and Energy Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Anna BattistiSISSA, Trieste, Italy.
Nikola MinovskiDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Alex RodriguezThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.
Sara FortunaItalian Institute of Technology (IIT), Genova, Italy.
Pilar CossioBiophysics of Tropical Diseases, Max Planck Tandem Group, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Alessandro LaioThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational peptide design is useful for therapeutics, diagnostics, and vaccine development. To select the most promising peptide candidates, the key is describing accurately the peptide-target interactions at the molecular level. We here review a computational peptide design protocol whose key feature is the use of all-atom explicit solvent molecular dynamics for describing the different peptide-target complexes explored during the optimization. We describe the milestones behind the development of this protocol, which is now implemented in an open-source code called PARCE. We provide a basic tutorial to run the code for an antibody fragment design example. Finally, we describe three additional applications of the method to design peptides for different targets, illustrating the broad scope of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationPeptidesSolventsPeptidesSolventsAffinity optimizationAntibody designConsensus scoring functionsEvolutionary algorithmIn silico antibody maturationMolecular dynamicsPeptide designSensor technology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.