Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298779›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience bulletin2022

From Parametric Representation to Dynamical System: Shifting Views of the Motor Cortex in Motor Control.

Tianwei Wang, Yun Chen, He Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Preparatory activity and the expansive null-space.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Visuo-vestibular heading perception: a model system to study multi-sensory decision making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianwei Wang *Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-5594
Yun Chen *Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-2160
He CuiCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China. cuihe@ion.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-9804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to traditional representational perspectives in which the motor cortex is involved in motor control via neuronal preference for kinetics and kinematics, a dynamical system perspective emerging in the last decade views the motor cortex as a dynamical machine that generates motor commands by autonomous temporal evolution. In this review, we first look back at the history of the representational and dynamical perspectives and discuss their explanatory power and controversy from both empirical and computational points of view. Here, we aim to reconcile the above perspectives, and evaluate their theoretical impact, future direction, and potential applications in brain-machine interfaces.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesMotor CortexBiomechanical PhenomenaNeuronsBrain-machine interfaceDimensionality reductionMachine learningNeural networkPopulation decoding

Identifiers

PMID35298779
PMCPMC9276910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.