Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298769›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2022

Promising Blood-Based Biomarkers for Melanoma: Recent Progress of Liquid Biopsy and Its Future Perspectives.

Hisashi Kanemaru, Yukari Mizukami, Akira Kaneko, Ikko Kajihara, Satoshi Fukushima

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Human CD79bFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hisashi KanemaruDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan. hisashikanemaru@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-6213
Yukari MizukamiDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4422-2049
Akira KanekoDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-2565
Ikko KajiharaDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-1621
Satoshi FukushimaDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-7682
Kumamoto University · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementBecause the recent success of novel therapeutic approaches has dramatically changed the clinical management of melanoma, less invasive and repeatable monitoring tools that can predict the disease status, drug resistance, and the development of side effects are increasingly needed. As liquid biopsy has enabled us to diagnose and monitor disease status less invasively, substantial attention has been directed toward this technique, which is gaining importance as a diagnostic and/or prognostic tool. It is evident that microRNA, cell-free DNA, and circulating tumor cells obtained via liquid biopsy are promising diagnostic and prognostic tools for melanoma, and they also have utility for monitoring the disease status and predicting drug effects. Although current challenges exist for each biomarker, such as poor sensitivity and/or specificity and technical problems, recent technical advances have increasingly improved these aspects. For example, next-generation sequencing technology for detecting microRNAs or cell-free DNA enabled high-throughput analysis and provided significantly higher sensitivity. In particular, cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing for quantifying cell-free DNA is a promising method for high-throughput analysis that provides real-time comprehensive data for patients at various disease stages. For wide clinical implementation, it is necessary to increase the sensitivity for the markers and standardize the assay procedures to make them reproducible, valid, and inexpensive; however, the broad clinical application of liquid biopsy could occur quickly. This review focuses on the significance of liquid biopsy, particularly related to the use of blood samples from patients with melanoma, and discusses its future perspectives.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsMelanomaMicroRNAsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsMicroRNAsBloodCell-free DNACirculating tumor cellsLiquid biopsyMelanomaMicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID35298769
OpenAlexW4221049924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.