Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298755›Full record

Trial reportJournal of autism and developmental disorders2023

An Explorative Study of Atypical Social Interaction Styles in Adult Men with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Men with Personality Disorders and Men from the General Population.

Richard Vuijk, Pieter de Nijs, Arnoud Arntz, Hilde M Geurts

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard VuijkSarr Autism Rotterdam, Dynamostraat 18, 3083 AK, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.vuijk@anteszorg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-359X
Pieter de NijsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-1981
Arnoud ArntzUniversity of Amsterdam, Postbus 15933, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7992-2272
Hilde M GeurtsUniversity of Amsterdam, Postbus 15933, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4824-9660
Antes · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLParnassia Groep · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different atypical social interaction styles (SISs) were defined and tested in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Whether these styles can also be distinguished in adults with ASD has not yet been explored. In men with ASD, men with personality disorder (PD), and men from the general population (N = 90), aged 18-65 years, we tested which SISs can be distinguished and how they relate to the presence of PD traits. We found a significant distinction in allocation to atypical SISs between the three groups. This study shows the presence of atypical SISs in adults with ASD, and complements previous SIS findings in children and adolescents with ASD.Trial registration The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR6391. Registered 04 May 2017.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdolescentAdultChildHumansMaleNetherlandsPersonality DisordersSocial InteractionAdultAutism spectrum disorderPersonality disorderSocial interaction styleSubtype

Identifiers

PMID35298755
OpenAlexW4220922746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.