ArticleThe AAPS journal2022
Model for Long Acting Injectables (Depot Formulation) Based on Pharmacokinetics and Physical Chemical Properties.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Making the Case for Organ-on-Chip Platforms in Long-Acting Therapeutics Development.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Generic Long-Acting Injectable Product Availability and Approval Standards.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Colistin-stabilized antisolvent precipitation enables engineering of microcrystalline niclosamide for inhalable composite powders.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- The synthesis of indomethacin prodrugs for the formation of nanosuspensions by emulsion templated freeze drying.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Improving in vivo release prediction from in situ forming depots with a novel flow-through in vitro dissolution apparatus.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Development of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to simulate the pharmacokinetics of intramuscular antiretroviral drugs.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
- A Perspective on Model-Informed IVIVC for Development of Subcutaneous Injectables.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- Current State and Opportunities with Long-acting Injectables: Industry Perspectives from the Innovation and Quality Consortium "Long-Acting Injectables" Working Group.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Review
- Delivering on the promise of protein degraders.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to develop a model to a priori identify the most suitable depot technology for a candidate based upon its therapeutic index (TI), pharmacokinetics (PK), and physical chemical properties. A depot map of release rates needed to achieve target PK in TI against release rates predicted based on intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) and particle size (PS) clearly identified three zones: (a) products and candidates around the line of identity for which suspension is the appropriate depot technology, (b) area to the right of line of identity in which depot candidates would require a controlled release technology such as PLGA microspheres since in vivo release rate needed for PK in TI is significantly lower than predicted based on IDR and PS, and (c) area to the left of the line of identity where IDR is not sufficient to achieve target in vivo release rate for PK in TI and hence enhanced dissolution is needed such as with nanoparticles. Dose-solubility technology map of approved depot products and candidates showed clusters of products around a depot technology such as suspensions and microspheres, for drugs with high dose/low solubility and low dose/high solubility compounds, respectively. Novel PK-based computational tool showed how all combinations of depot doses and release rate constants for a candidate can be calculated to achieve plasma levels within the TI bounded by minimum effective and minimum toxic concentrations (MEC and MTC). The PK predictions for several drugs such as estradiol, risperidone, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and ziprasidone showed how these predictions can guide scientists to target specific depot doses and release rates into the depot formulation. In parallel, IDR of depot compounds clearly showed differentiation of compounds by successful depot technologies to achieve target dose and duration. For drugs with IDR between 0.1 and 1 mg/h/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
35298711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.