Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298616›Full record

ArticleFEMS yeast research2022

Creeping yeast: a simple, cheap and robust protocol for the identification of mating type in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Samantha D M Arras, Taylor R Hibbard, Lucy Mitsugi-McHattie, Matthew A Woods, Charlotte E Johnson, Andrew Munkacsi, Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat, Austen R D Ganley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS yeast research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha D M ArrasSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Taylor R HibbardSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.
Lucy Mitsugi-McHattieSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Matthew A WoodsDigital Life Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 0632, New Zealand.
Charlotte E JohnsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Andrew MunkacsiSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.
Sylvie Hermann-Le DenmatSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1299-4749
Austen R D GanleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-7522
University of Auckland · NZVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an exceptional genetic system, with genetic crosses facilitated by its ability to be maintained in haploid and diploid forms. Such crosses are straightforward if the mating type/ploidy of the strains is known. Several techniques can determine mating type (or ploidy), but all have limitations. Here, we validate a simple, cheap and robust method to identify S. cerevisiae mating types. When cells of opposite mating type are mixed in liquid media, they 'creep' up the culture vessel sides, a phenotype that can be easily detected visually. In contrast, mixtures of the same mating type or with a diploid simply settle out. The phenotype is observable for several days under a range of routine growth conditions and with different media/strains. Microscopy suggests that cell aggregation during mating is responsible for the phenotype. Yeast knockout collection analysis identified 107 genes required for the creeping phenotype, with these being enriched for mating-specific genes. Surprisingly, the RIM101 signaling pathway was strongly represented. We propose that RIM101 signaling regulates aggregation as part of a wider, previously unrecognized role in mating. The simplicity and robustness of this method make it ideal for routine verification of S. cerevisiae mating type, with future studies required to verify its molecular basis.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsHaploidyPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsaggluntininmating phenotypemating type assayRIM101Saccharomyces cerevisiaesexual aggregation

Identifiers

PMID35298616
PMCPMC9202641
OpenAlexW4220845552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.