Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Development and validation of new evaluation scale for measuring stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation in rehabilitation wards.

Taiki Yoshida, Yohei Otaka, Shin Kitamura, Kazuki Ushizawa, Masashi Kumagai, Yuto Kurihara, Jun Yaeda, Rieko Osu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06661512 (Acquired Brain Injury and Neurorehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06661512 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Acquired Brain Injury and Neurorehabilitation: the Influence of Psychological Characteristics

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorInstitut GuttmannRan2024 to 2029Enrolled200ConditionsBrain Injury, Stroke Patients, TBI-Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsNeurorehabilitation program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivation as a Measurable Outcome in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Patient motivation: A concept analysis.Belitung nursing journal · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Taiki YoshidaTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-7102
Yohei OtakaTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Shin KitamuraTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-0854
Kazuki UshizawaTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Masashi KumagaiTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yuto KuriharaGraduate School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
Jun YaedaGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Science, University of Tsukuba, Tokyo, Japan.
Rieko OsuFaculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPWaseda University · JPHebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop the Motivation in stroke patients for rehabilitation scale (MORE scale), following the Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN).

methodStudy participants included rehabilitation professionals working at the convalescent rehabilitation hospital and stroke patients admitted to the hospital. The original MORE scale was developed from an item pool, which was created through discussions of nine rehabilitation professionals. After the content validity of the scale was verified using the Delphi method with 61 rehabilitation professionals and 22 stroke patients, the scale's validity and reliability were examined for 201 stroke patients. The construct validity of the scale was investigated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and item response theory analysis. Cronbach's alpha confirmed its internal consistency. Regarding convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity, Spearman's rho was calculated between the MORE scale and the Apathy Scale (AS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which rates the subjective feelings of motivation.

resultsUsing the Delphi method, 17 items were incorporated into the MORE scale. According to EFA and CFA, a one-factor model was suggested. All MORE scale items demonstrated satisfactory item response, with item slopes ranging from 0.811 to 2.142, and item difficulty parameters ranging from -3.203 to 0.522. Cronbach's alpha was 0.948. Regarding test-retest reliability, a moderate correlation was found between scores at the beginning and one month after hospitalization (rho = 0.612. p < 0.001). The MORE scale showed significant correlation with AS (rho = -0.536, p < 0.001), SDS (rho = -0.347, p < 0.001), and VAS (rho = 0.536, p < 0.001), confirming the convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity, respectively.

conclusionsThe MORE scale was verified as a valid and reliable scale for evaluating stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation.

Indexed as

MotivationStrokeHospitalsHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35298513
PMCPMC8929594
OpenAlexW4221028153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.