Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298494›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Cell tip growth underlies injury response of marine macroalgae.

Maki Shirae-Kurabayashi, Tomoya Edzuka, Masahiro Suzuki, Gohta Goshima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maki Shirae-KurabayashiSugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Sugashima, Toba, Japan.
Tomoya EdzukaSugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Sugashima, Toba, Japan.
Masahiro SuzukiKobe University Research Center for Inland Seas, Iwaya, Awaji, Hyogo, Japan.
Gohta GoshimaSugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Sugashima, Toba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7524-8770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration is a widely observed phenomenon by which the integrity of an organism is recovered after damage. To date, studies on the molecular and cellular mechanisms of regeneration have been limited to a handful of model multicellular organisms. Here, the regeneration ability of marine macroalgae (Rhodophyta, Phaeophyceae, Chlorophyta) was systematically surveyed after thallus severing. Live cell imaging on severed thalli uncovered the cellular response to the damage. Three types of responses-budding, rhizoid formation, and/or sporulation-were observed in 25 species among 66 examined, proving the high potential of regeneration of macroalgae. The cellular and nuclear dynamics were monitored during cell repair or rhizoid formation of four phylogenetically diverged species, and the tip growth of the cells near the damaged site was observed as a common response. Nuclear translocation followed tip growth, enabling overall distribution of multinuclei or central positioning of the mononucleus. In contrast, the control of cell cycle events, such as nuclear division and septation, varied in these species. These observations showed that marine macroalgae utilise a variety of regeneration pathways, with some common features. This study also provides a novel methodology of live cell imaging in macroalgae.

Indexed as

ChlorophytaPhaeophyceaeRhodophytaSeaweedCell Division

Identifiers

PMID35298494
PMCPMC8929694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.