Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298476›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Visual performance with multifocal lenses in young adults and presbyopes.

Shrilekha Vedhakrishnan, Maria Vinas, Clara Benedi-Garcia, Pilar Casado, Susana Marcos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Statistical Model of Ocular Wavefronts With Accommodation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correction of presbyopia.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shrilekha VedhakrishnanLaboratory of Visual Optics & Biophotonics, Instituto de Optica, (IO-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-9972
Maria VinasWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Clara Benedi-GarciaLaboratory of Visual Optics & Biophotonics, Instituto de Optica, (IO-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar CasadoLaboratory of Visual Optics & Biophotonics, Instituto de Optica, (IO-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Spain.
Susana MarcosLaboratory of Visual Optics & Biophotonics, Instituto de Optica, (IO-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Spain.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A better understanding of visual performance with Multifocal Contact Lenses (MCLs) is essential, both in young eyes, where MCLs may be prescribed to control the progression of myopia wherein the MCLs optics interact with accommodation, and in presbyopes, where MCLs are increasingly used to compensate the lack of accommodation. In this study, we evaluated the through focus visual acuity (TFVA) with center-near MCLs of three additions (low, medium and high) and without an addition (NoLens) in 10 young adults and 5 presbyopes. We studied the effect of accommodation, age and pupil diameter (in cyclopleged subjects) on visual performance. The MCLs produced a small but consistent degradation at far (by 0.925 logMAR, averaged across eyes and conditions) and a consistent benefit at near in young subjects with paralyzed accommodation (by 1.025 logMAR), and in presbyopes with both paralyzed and natural accommodation (by 1.071 logMAR, on average). TFVA in young adults with NoLens and all MCLs showed statistically significant differences (Wilcoxan, p<0.01) between natural and paralyzed accommodation, but not in presbyopes with MCLs. In young adults, VA improved with increasing pupil diameter with the HighAdd MCL (0.08 logMAR shift from 3 to 5-mm pupil size). Visual imbalance (standard deviation of VA across distances) was reduced with MCLs, and decreased significantly with increasing near add. The lowest imbalance occurred in young adults under natural accommodation and was further reduced by 13.33% with MCLs with respect to the NoLens condition. Overall, the visual performance with MCLs in young adults exceeds that in presbyopes at all distances, and was better than 0.00 logMAR over the dioptric range tested. In conclusion, the center-near lenses do not degrade the near high contrast visual acuity significantly but maintains the far vision in young adults, and produce some visual benefit at near in presbyopes.

Indexed as

PresbyopiaRefraction, OcularAccommodation, OcularEyeglassesHumansPupilYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35298476
PMCPMC8929584
OpenAlexW4220908413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.