Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35298041›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2022

Reliability of reward ERPs in middle-late adolescents using a custom and a standardized preprocessing pipeline.

György Hámori, Alexandra Rádosi, Bea Pászthy, János M Réthelyi, István Ulbert, Richárd Fiáth, Nóra Bunford

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

György HámoriDevelopmental and Translational Neuroscience Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexandra RádosiDevelopmental and Translational Neuroscience Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Bea Pászthy1st Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
János M RéthelyiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
István UlbertIntegrative Neuroscience Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Richárd FiáthIntegrative Neuroscience Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Nóra BunfordDevelopmental and Translational Neuroscience Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9645-604X
Semmelweis University · HUPázmány Péter Catholic University · HUBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HUInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advantage of neuroimaging measures in translational research frameworks, less is known about the psychometric properties thereof, especially in middle-late adolescents. Earlier, we examined evidence of convergent and incremental validity of reward anticipation and response event-related potentials (ERPs) and here we examined, in the same sample of 43 adolescents (M

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsRewardSignal-To-Noise RatioadolescentERP preprocessing pipelineevent-related potentialpsychometric propertyreward

Identifiers

PMID35298041
PMCPMC9541384
OpenAlexW4220732028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.