Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297954›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2022

Synaptic pruning of murine adult-born neurons by microglia depends on phosphatidylserine.

Chihiro Kurematsu, Masato Sawada, Masaki Ohmuraya, Motoki Tanaka, Kazuya Kuboyama, Takashi Ogino, Mami Matsumoto, Hisashi Oishi, Hiroyuki Inada, Yuri Ishido and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Microglia extract neuronal proteolytic organelles via skoupocytosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Microglial phagocytosis in Alzheimer disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Chihiro KurematsuDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7816-8426
Masato SawadaDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8694-8526
Masaki OhmurayaDepartment of Genetics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9707-3932
Motoki TanakaDepartment of Disease Model, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-9693
Kazuya KuboyamaDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9878-1209
Takashi OginoDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1619-8659
Mami MatsumotoDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-5916
Hisashi OishiDepartment of Comparative and Experimental Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9988-6993
Hiroyuki InadaDivision of Homeostatic Development, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1166-8535
Yuri IshidoDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4965-1870
Yukina SakakibaraDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-1830
Huy Bang NguyenSection of Electron Microscopy, Supportive Center for Brain Research, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7823-067X
Truc Quynh ThaiSection of Electron Microscopy, Supportive Center for Brain Research, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-497X
Shinichi KohsakaNational Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-5952
Nobuhiko OhnoDepartment of Anatomy, Division of Histology and Cell Biology, Jichi Medical University, School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6536-2753
Maki K YamadaDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Kagawa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Institute of Neuroscience, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-6069
Masato AsaiDepartment of Disease Model, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-373X
Masahiro SokabeMechanobiology Laboratory, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-0166
Junichi NabekuraDivision of Homeostatic Development, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5834-6272
Kenichi AsanoLaboratory of Immune Regulation, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Hachioji, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0218-1517
Masato TanakaLaboratory of Immune Regulation, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Hachioji, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9243-5906
Kazunobu SawamotoDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-5129
Nagoya City University · JPTokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences · JPNational Institute for Physiological Sciences · JPAichi Developmental Disability Center · JPHyogo Medical University · JPJichi Medical University · JPNagoya University · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNTokushima Bunri University · JPUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New neurons, continuously added in the adult olfactory bulb (OB) and hippocampus, are involved in information processing in neural circuits. Here, we show that synaptic pruning of adult-born neurons by microglia depends on phosphatidylserine (PS), whose exposure on dendritic spines is inversely correlated with their input activity. To study the role of PS in spine pruning by microglia in vivo, we developed an inducible transgenic mouse line, in which the exposed PS is masked by a dominant-negative form of milk fat globule-EGF-factor 8 (MFG-E8), MFG-E8D89E. In this transgenic mouse, the spine pruning of adult-born neurons by microglia is impaired in the OB and hippocampus. Furthermore, the electrophysiological properties of these adult-born neurons are altered in MFG-E8D89E mice. These data suggest that PS is involved in the microglial spine pruning and the functional maturation of adult-born neurons. The MFG-E8D89E-based genetic approach shown in this study has broad applications for understanding the biology of PS-mediated phagocytosis in vivo.

Indexed as

MicrogliaPhosphatidylserinesAnimalsAntigens, SurfaceMiceMice, TransgenicNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsAntigens, SurfacePhosphatidylserines

Identifiers

PMID35297954
PMCPMC9195048
OpenAlexW4221002516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.