Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297608›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022

Utilization of Machine Learning for the Differentiation of Positional NPS Isomers with Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry.

Jennifer L Bonetti, Saer Samanipour, Arian C van Asten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer L BonettiVan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, Amsterdam 1090 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-5368
Saer SamanipourVan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, Amsterdam 1090 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8270-6979
Arian C van AstenVan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, Amsterdam 1090 GD, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differentiation of positional isomers is a well established analytical challenge for forensic laboratories. As more novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) are introduced to the illicit drug market, robust yet efficient methods of isomer identification are needed. Although current literature suggests that Direct Analysis in Real Time-Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry (DART-ToF) with in-source collision induced dissociation (is-CID) can be used to differentiate positional isomers, it is currently unclear whether this capability extends to positional isomers whose only structural difference is the precise location of a single substitution on an aromatic ring. The aim of this work was to determine whether chemometric analysis of DART-ToF data could offer forensic laboratories an alternative rapid and robust method of differentiating NPS positional ring isomers. To test the feasibility of this technique, three positional isomer sets (fluoroamphetamine, fluoromethamphetamine, and methylmethcathinone) were analyzed. Using a linear rail for consistent sample introduction, the three isomers of each type were analyzed 96 times over an eight-week timespan. The classification methods investigated included a univariate approach, the Welch

Indexed as

Machine LearningIsomerismMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID35297608
PMCPMC8968871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.