ArticleJournal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision2022
Computing a projection operator onto the null space of a linear imaging operator: tutorial.
Article in Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interior soft x-ray tomography with sparse global sampling.Physica scripta · 2025Article
- Computing a projection operator onto the null space of a linear imaging operator: tutorial.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2022Article
- On Hallucinations in Tomographic Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many imaging systems can be approximately described by a linear operator that maps an object property to a collection of discrete measurements. However, even in the absence of measurement noise, such operators are generally "blind" to certain components of the object, and hence information is lost in the imaging process. Mathematically, this is explained by the fact that the imaging operator can possess a null space. All objects in the null space, by definition, are mapped to a collection of identically zero measurements and are hence invisible to the imaging system. As such, characterizing the null space of an imaging operator is of fundamental importance when comparing and/or designing imaging systems. A characterization of the null space can also facilitate the design of regularization strategies for image reconstruction methods. Characterizing the null space via an associated projection operator is, in general, a computationally demanding task. In this tutorial, computational procedures for establishing projection operators that map an object to the null space of a discrete-to-discrete imaging operator are surveyed. A new machine-learning-based approach that employs a linear autoencoder is also presented. The procedures are demonstrated by use of biomedical imaging examples, and their computational complexities and memory requirements are compared.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.