Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297293›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2022

Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 285,000 CpG sites in the mouse genome.

Carlos A Garcia-Prieto, Damiana Álvarez-Errico, Eva Musulen, Alberto Bueno-Costa, Berta N Vazquez, Alejandro Vaquero, Manel Esteller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenomic insights into common human disease pathology.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DNA methylation in poultry: a review.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos A Garcia-PrietoCancer Epigenetics Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.
Damiana Álvarez-ErricoCancer Epigenetics Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.
Eva MusulenCancer Epigenetics Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto Bueno-CostaCancer Epigenetics Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.
Berta N VazquezChromatin Biology Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro VaqueroChromatin Biology Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.
Manel EstellerCancer Epigenetics Group, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-6093
Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute · ESBarcelona Supercomputing Center · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse has been extensively used as a model organism in many studies to characterize biological pathways and drug effects and to mimic human diseases. Similar DNA sequences between both species facilitate these types of experiments. However, much less is known about the mouse epigenome, particularly for DNA methylation. Progress in delivering mouse DNA methylomes has been slow due to the currently available time-consuming and expensive methodologies. Following the great acceptance of the human DNA methylation microarrays, we have herein validated a newly developed DNA methylation microarray (Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip) that interrogates 280,754 unique CpG sites within the mouse genome. The CpGs included in the platform cover CpG Islands, shores, shelves and open sea sequences, and loci surrounding transcription start sites and gene bodies. From a functional standpoint, mouse ENCODE representative DNase hypersensitivity sites (rDHSs) and candidate cis-Regulatory Elements (cCREs) are also included. Herein, we show that the profiled mouse DNA methylation microarray provides reliable values among technical replicates; matched results from fresh frozen versus formalin-fixed samples; detects hemimethylated X-chromosome and imprinted CpG sites; and is able to determine CpG methylation changes in mouse cell lines treated with a DNA demethylating agent or upon genetic disruption of a DNA methyltransferase. Most important, using unsupervised hierarchical clustering and t-SNE approaches, the platform is able to classify all types of normal mouse tissues and organs. These data underscore the great features of the assessed microarray to obtain comprehensive DNA methylation profiles of the mouse genome.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationFormaldehydeAnimalsDeoxyribonucleasesDNAMethyltransferasesMiceTranscription Initiation SiteDeoxyribonucleasesDNAFormaldehydeMethyltransferasesCpG sitesDNA methylationepigeneticsmicroarrayMousevalidation

Identifiers

PMID35297293
PMCPMC9621044
OpenAlexW4221095743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.