Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297289›Full record

ArticleJournal of perioperative practice

Developing guidance for the management of intraoperative anaesthetic machine failure.

Benjamin Milne, Kate Prior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perioperative practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin MilneDepartment of Anaesthesia & Pain Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1804-6125
Kate PriorKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative anaesthetic machine failure represents an immediate risk to patient safety, as well as risking long-term harm in the form of accidental awareness under general anaesthesia. Currently, there is no widely accepted consensus guidance for the management of such an event. Based upon institutional experiences of anaesthetic machine failure and the principles of delivering good-quality care under emergency scenarios, we devised a single-sheet guideline for management of this event. This guidance assigns clear roles in the management of the event, identifies the key priorities for immediate care, and makes provisions for ensuring ongoing high-quality care following the event. Discussion is given to the rationale for the key components, and the importance of involving the whole perioperative team in developing such guidance. Further discussion involves the crucial elements of local implementation, making sure that guidance is location and personnel specific. Key future steps in this important patient safety project are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnestheticsAnesthesia, GeneralHumansQuality of Health CareAnestheticsAnaesthesiaAnaesthetic machineCritical IncidentsEmergency guidanceEquipment failure

Identifiers

PMID35297289
PMCPMC10331508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.