Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297232›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

"Attending to History" in Major System Change in Healthcare in England: Specialist Cancer Surgery Service Reconfiguration.

Catherine Perry, Ruth J Boaden, Georgia B Black, Caroline S Clarke, Sarah Darley, Angus I G Ramsay, David C Shackley, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Naomi J Fulop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine PerryApplied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-6923
Ruth J BoadenAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-6405
Georgia B BlackDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2676-5071
Caroline S ClarkeUCL Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4676-1257
Sarah DarleyCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5420-6774
Angus I G RamsayDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-6916
David C ShackleyChristie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8326-2556
Cecilia Vindrola-PadrosDepartment of Targeted Intervention, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-1646
Naomi J FulopDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-6140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reconfiguration of specialist hospital services, with service provision concentrated in a reduced number of sites, is one example of major system change (MSC) for which there is evidence of improved patient outcomes. This paper explores the reconfiguration of specialist oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer surgery services in a large urban area of England (Greater Manchester, GM), with a focus on the role of history in this change process and how reconfiguration was achieved after previous failed attempts.

methodsThis study draws on qualitative research from a mixed-methods evaluation of the reconfiguration of specialist cancer surgery services in GM. Forty-six interviews with relevant stakeholders were carried out, along with ~160 hours of observations at meetings and the acquisition of ~300 pertinent documents. Thematic analysis using deductive and inductive approaches was undertaken, guided by a framework of 'simple rules' for MSC.

resultsThrough an awareness of, and attention to, history, leaders developed a change process which took into account previous unsuccessful reconfiguration attempts, enabling them to reduce the impact of potentially challenging issues. Interviewees described attending to issues involving competition between provider sites, change leadership, engagement with stakeholders, and the need for a process of change resilient to challenge.

conclusionRecognition of, and response to, history, using a range of perspectives, enabled this reconfiguration. Particularly important was the way in which history influenced and informed other aspects of the change process and the influence of stakeholder power. This study provides further learning about MSC and the need for a range of perspectives to enable understanding. It shows how learning from history can be used to enable successful change.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNeoplasmsEnglandHealth FacilitiesHumansLeadershipQualitative ResearchCentralisationHistoryMajor System ChangeQualitative ResearchReconfiguration of Services

Identifiers

PMID35297232
PMCPMC10105206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.